countermoneylaundering.com

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Money Laundering / Terrorist Financing Risk for lawyers.
Money Laundering / Terrorist Financing Risk for lawyers.

Money Laundering / Terrorist Financing Risk for lawyers.

The subject of money laundering, etc. regulations for law firms has been debated for more than 30 years. Even today, some lawyers and their trade bodies resist the imposition of a regulatory regime. 
But compliance is about what regulators tell lawyers to do.  When it comes to the risk of taking part in a money laundering scheme, that's a different issue entirely. 
Banks, accountants and other service providers are all at risk if lawyers launder for their clients. And they all have their own, primary, regulatory and criminal law risks.
Lawyers amplify the risks that banks, etc., face.

 

That's all about a defined, regulated sector. There's more.

The risk that other, non-regulated sector, businesses will be used by criminals to launder money, to make corrupt payments, to give support to terrorists or even to be a conduit for fraud puts those businesses, officers and staff in the sights of prosecutors. And because of Tranche II, their own professional advisers will be scrutinising those businesses more closely. It is all types of business for example, private schools and medicine, restaurants, personal grooming and car dealers to say nothing of information providers, the service sector and manufacturing and software.

Money laundering cannot exist in a vacuum. Money laundering only happens when someone creates another crime and takes steps to hide, move and/or invest any benefit that person has obtained for himself or for someone else.

Source of Funds is not a matter of regulation, it's a question of risk. The regulatory regime merely says that the source of funds must be identified and a regulated business must be satisfied it is not suspicious. The question whether funds are suspicious is part of your financial crime risk policies and procedures.

Compliance is binary: does the regulated business have the policies in place and do they use them? Yes or No. That's why computers are brilliant at it. 

Risk is endlessly variable. It is rarely binary. It requires interpretation and that's why computers can't do it. 

TAKING PROCEEDS OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT FOR YOUR FEES IS PRIMA FACIE A CRIMINAL OFFENCE. 

That means someone could go to jail. That's only one part of a complex system of sentencing options. The others are fines, confiscation and when the risks of confiscation of commingled funds is taken into account, the financial risks of being, or helping, a money launderer can be devastating. 

So while others concentrate on the clerical function which is compliance, Nigel Morris-Cotterill has since 1994 concentrated on the risks that business are exposed to, often in the ordinary course of their business activities. 

My client was cleverer than me

There is much fuss about lawyers and money laundering and rightly so.

To put it into perspective: a senior financial crimes officer with London's Metropolitan Police said that, in every money laundering case that came before him, there were lawyers involved.

More than 30 years later, that's still more or less the case. The only reason it's not the case now is that so many other business areas, such as accountants, deliver legal or quasi-legal services and in money laundering schemes they do the things lawyers used to do.

It is true that many money laundering schemes do not require a legal, i.e. business, structure.

The involvement of lawyers goes beyond creating and managing legal structures: it includes being an active participant in laundering schemes. And schemes for bribery, corruption and terrorist financing. Lawyers provide a shield of confidentiality and their bank accounts hide ownership of funds from banks. Their bank accounts can be used to provide banking services, completely hidden from an outside view - indeed, not "can" be used - "are" used because it is an essential part of the provision of some services especially in large law corporations and tiny firms in remote locations. 

In this way, lawyers are at risk from their clients and from other lawyers; and lawyers present risks for other lawyers and a wide range of financial institutions.

This seminar is about identifying and dealing with risk. It is not about law or compliance.

It is therefore non-jurisdictional.

Nigel Morris-Cotterill was a solicitor in England and Wales, now retired from practice, and has real-world experience of the issues concerned.

Nigel Morris-Cotterill explained the risks to lawyers in his 1996 book "How not to be a money launderer".  He wrote the only book on "Understanding Suspicion in Financial Crime", now in its second edition, and most recently published SAFE WORD: NO,  a book on fraud and internet safety for general readership.

Morris-Cotterill is also the author of a multi-part work "Trade-Based Financial Crime - Beyond TBML". Volume 1 and Volume 2 have been published and Volume 3 is in preparation. 

See also:

Understanding suspicion in financial crime

Introduction to the Risk Matrix and Algorithms

Trade based financial crime

Course format: Money Laundering / Terrorist Financing Risk for Lawyers

Format: seminar U-shape. Presenter at front.

Times: two working days, four sessions per day.

Slides/Video: no

Workbook: yes

Jurisdiction: non-jurisdictional

Language: English

Venue: In house or in organised groups. 

Location: your offices or off-site.

Key Takeaways: Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risk for Lawyers

Why lawyers are a special group.

Why lawyers should decide to not be a special group.

How others claim to be part of that special group. 

Ways in which legitimate business creates criminal liability.

Why a "facilitator" under the Regulations is a "conspirator" in law. 

How clients' accounts are used by criminals but the lawyers don't realise.

Why lawyers present special risks for bankers.

How lawyers become part of the financial crime scheme but think they are delivering professional services.

Why financial crime compliance measures are in the interests of the law firm/corporation even if there is no regulatory regime.

Where criminal liability falls depending on the legal structure adopted. 

 

Who should attend - Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risk for Lawyers

Those providing financial and other regulated services to lawyers

Law firms: All partners and staff having access to information relating to clients and/or their affairs.

Law Corporations: All directors and staff having access to information relating to clients and/or their affairs.

Investigation agencies, intelligence agencies, policy makers, regulators

Which industries should attend Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risk for Lawyers

Which industries should attend Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risk for Lawyers

Law firms and law corporations

Trust companies

Wills and Probate companies

Company formation agents and company services providers

 

Enquire

For more information and the course outline. 

Your email will be validated against MX Records.

Corporate email address only. 

Click here


 

 

 

back to

  1. Courses home
  2. Front page

Floor Guide

  • Articles
  • Courses
  • e-learning
  • Books (opens in new tab)
  • Appearances

User account menu

  • Enquiries (opens in new tab)
  • Legal and Privacy (opens in new tab)
  • Media credits (opens in new tab)
  • Log in
proudly produced with actual intelligence

Built with Drupal     |     Hosted by Siteground     |     Template by Alaa Haddad     |     Design by Vortex Centrum Limited. 


 

Copyright © 1994 - 2026 Nigel Morris-Cotterill - All rights reserved - bot access denied

Developed & Designed by Alaa Haddad